Legal Opinion

Boyd v. . Campbell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 27, 1926PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The deed is not invalidated by the clause in which the grantee purports to convey to himself. In every conveyance of land there must be a grantor, a grantee, and a thing granted. The grantor cannot make bimself the grantee; but W. J. G. B. Boyd, wbo signed the deed, is named as tbe grantor, and with, the exception o£ one inadvertence the plaintiff is referred to as the grantee. The error is clerical and the objection must be resolved against the appellant under the principle stated in Berry v. Cedar Works, 184 N. C., 187. See, also, Yates v. Ins. Co., 173 N. C., 473.

Whatever the former…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. . BrissonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Pugh v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Seawell v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Wilkins v. NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Morton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Williamson v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Williamson v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API