Rouse v. Strickland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The .sole question is whether the court erred in concluding that the 1936 deed conveyed to Mrs. Ella S. Mann only a life estate in the land described therein as the “4th TRACT,” to wit, the J. T. Mann homeplace.
“Ordinarily, in construing a deed it is the duty of the court to ascertain the intent of the grantor or grantors -a® embodied in the entire instrument, and eaich and every part thereof must be given effect if this can be done 'by any fair or reasonable interpretation.” Davis v. Brown, 241 N.C. 116, 118, 84 S.E. 2d 334, and cases cited; Franklin v. Faulkner, 248 N.C. 656, 659, 104 S.E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oxendine v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Franklin v. FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Cannon v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cleveland Realty Company v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Barrier v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Hardy v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Simmons v. Quick Stop Food Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982