Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Faulkner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1958No. 95PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

What property did Miller convey to Angelí by the deed of 15 February 1950? The answer is determinative of the appeal and must be found by ascertaining the intent of the parties to that instrument.

When courts are called upon to interpret deeds or other writings, they seek to ascertain the intent of the parties, and, when ascertained, that intent becomes the deed, will, or contract. In determining the intent they call to their aid principles which have been so consistently applied as to be described as settled rules of construction. Griffin v. Springer, 244 N.C. 95, 92 S.E. 2d 682; Davis v.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Cherry v. Slade's AdministratorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1819
  2. Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Skipper v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Simmons v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Carney v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Capps v. SOUTHEASTERN CABLECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Board of Transportation v. PelletierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API