Legal Opinion

Durkee v. Chino Land and Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1907No. L.A. No. 1892PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages from the defendant, claimed to have been sustained by him on account of the defendant wrongfully and negligently allowing its cattle to trespass upon certain grain and. pasture lands owned and leased by him in the vicinity of Chino, in San Bernardino County.

The complaint stated four causes of action, and judgment . was rendered in favor of plaintiff upon the first three, but denied upon the fourth.

The first, count alleged the trespass of said cattle on three hundred and twenty acres of land belonging to plaintiff between December 1,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bullard v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Janson v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Story v. NidifferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Goodale v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gibson Properties Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, LLC v. Town of Mammoth LakesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Fort Bragg Unified School District v. Colonial American Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Merrill v. KohlbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API