Legal Opinion

Story v. Nidiffer

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1905No. S.F. No. 3672PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.—

Trespass. The cause was tried to a jury and plaintiff had a verdict for three hundred and twenty-five dollars. Judgment passed accordingly, from which defendant appeals, and also from the order refusing his motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff was in possession of forty acres of land in Fresno County under a contract to purchase. He planted about thirty-five acres to Indian corn. The complaint charges that the defendant’s cattle in the early part of July, 1902, “ran and trespassed upon said land and ate and entirely destroyed said corn so that the same will not mature and produce a…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Gibson Properties Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People v. WillmurthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. ForsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API