Legal Opinion

Miller v. Preston

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 18, 1938No. [No. 46, January Term, 1938.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The plaintiff, appellant, C. Wilbur Miller, sued Richard M. Preston, James Bruce, Henry E. Treide, and G. Ridgely Sappington, who are the appellees here and the only defendants summoned, and six other persons, and four nonresident corporations, upon whom there was no service of summons.

The declaration charges the appellees and Sir Auckland C. Geddes, William Sequine, Albert H. Wiggin, John N. Buchanan, Thomas Robbins, and John J. Watson, and Rio Tinto Company, Ltd. (of England), the Pyrites Com pany, Inc. (of Delaware), the Chase National Bank, a national bank (of New York), and the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kimball v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  2. Willett v. HerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Robertson v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Owens v. GraetzelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Natural Design, Inc. v. Rouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. MacKlin v. Robert Logan AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Carr v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Waller v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API