Legal Opinion
Willett v. Herrick
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 9, 1927PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
In this action of tort the defendants are charged with having deprived the plaintiffs of their property and business by means of an unlawful combination or conspiracy. The plaintiffs are George F. Willett and Edmund H. Sears, late copartners under the firm name of Willett, Sears and Company. The defendants are the persons alleged to be copartners in the firm of Kidder, Peabody and Company, the persons alleged to be copartners in the firm of F. S. Moseley and Company, and Robert F. Herrick. The Chase National Bank of New York City was named in the writ as one of the defendants but it was not…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Smith v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Morse v. WoodworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Ruiz v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Eigerman v. Putnam Investments, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Sargent v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Cabot Corp. v. AVX Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Berry v. KyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.