Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Harman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 1, 1871PublishedCited by 68 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, J.

This was an action on the case, grounded on an alleged conspiracy by the three defendants to injure the plaintiffs, the present appellees. The declaration contains four counts and charges, in substance, that the defendants combined and conspired together to defeat the right of the plaintiffs to receive and possess a certain lot of bedsteads which they had purchased of Kimball, the appellant, and whereby they, the plaintiffs, were subjected to great trouble, delay and vexatious litigation.

The case was tried on the general issue plea of not guilty, and the verdict was in favor of the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adler v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. MacKey v. Compass Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Fare Deals Ltd. v. World Choice Travel. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  5. McLaughlin v. CopelandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API