Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Doschades

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1929No. 5120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUDGE, O. J.

Respondent brought this action against appellant to recover upon two promissory notes, set forth in the complaint under two causes of action. After trial of the cause to court and jury, verdict was returned for respondent for the full amount claimed, and this appeal is prosecuted from the judgment entered on the verdict. There is no controversy here regarding the note set forth in the second cause of action. As to the proceedings involving recovery on the note made the basis of recovery under respondent’s first cause of action, appellant contends (1) that the court erred in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webster v. McCulloughIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. First State Bank v. RadkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Casey v. EmpeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mochel v. ClevelandIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Leonard v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Plaza Hotel Co. v. StrattonNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. McCarthy v. HarropIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Harbour v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API