Legal Opinion

Mochel v. Cleveland

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1930No. 5641PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

In 1899, one Holcomb and his wife dedicated certain platted lots and streets to the city of Lewiston. The dedication was known as “Holcomb’s First Subdivision of Lot 10 of Acres, Lewiston, Idaho.” Prospect Avenue, an integral part of the tract dedicated, consisted of a strip, eighty feet wide, running north and south, the west boundary line thereof constituting the west boundary of said subdivision.

In 1922, the city of Lewiston by Ordinance No. 97Ó vacated the west twenty feet of Prospect Avenue and authorized the mayor and the city controller to execute quitclaim deeds “to the abutting…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sparks v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Sowadzki v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Remey v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Mark Means Transfer Co. v. MackinzieIdaho Supreme Court · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Curlee v. Kootenai County Fire & RescueIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ellis v. ButterfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. City of Evanston v. RobinsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Payne v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API