Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Harrop

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1931No. 5698PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, C. J.

—Suit by plaintiff and respondent, Dan McCarthy, against Frank and Jesse Harrop, as executors, defendants and appellants, to recover on a promissory note executed and delivered plaintiff by the decedent, Samuel Harrop. In defense, appellants plead both lack and failure of consideration. A jury trial terminated with a judgment in appellants’ favor; and, respondent having moved for a new trial on divers grounds, the court granted his motion upon two of the grounds specified, expressly overruling all the others. Both sides appealed.

The two grounds as recited by the court were:

“That the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pettiford v. . MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Brown v. GrubbIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. First National Bank v. DoschadesIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Wilson v. VogelerIdaho Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosenberry v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. ProctorIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API