Plaza Hotel Co. v. Stratton
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This is an action on a promissory note. Defense relied on is want of consideration. Trial of the cause to court and jury resulted in a verdict and judgment thereon for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff contends that the court erred in giving certain instructions, one of which informed the jury that the bur-' den was on the plaintiff to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that there was a good and valuable consideration for the promissory note. Counsel for defendant contends that this is a correct statement of the law and cites in support of his contention Search v. Miller, 9…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shotwell v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Elmcreek Ditch Co. v. St. JohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Search v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- First State Bank v. RadkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. KuhnNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leonard v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Leach v. TreberNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Blaha GMC-Jeep, Inc. v. FrerichsNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Fluckey v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Caldwell v. WellsNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.