Legal Opinion

Marion Power Shovel Co. v. Huntsman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1969No. 5-4749PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Marion Power Shovel Co. was the plaintiff in the trial court. Harold Huntsman, appellee and cross-appellant, was the defendant and counterclaimant below. Marion sued for parts supplied to Huntsman which were used to repair a power shovel with a dragline attachment. Huntsman countered with a complaint for breach of warranty concerning the original construction equipment, it having been manufactured by Marion. Huntsman obtained judgment (the trial court sitting as a jury) under his counterclaim and Marion appeals. Huntsman cross-appeals, alleging insufficiency of damages.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Dailey v. Holiday Distributing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Hunt v. PERKINS MACHINERY CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Hewitt-Robins, Inc. v. Lea County Sand & Gravel, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Ruberoid Company, Incorporated v. W. P. Briscoe and Gordon L. Briscoe, Doing Business as Briscoe & BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Farmer v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Taterka v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pearson v. Franklin Laboratories, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Whitaker v. Farmhand, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gramling v. BaltzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API