Marion Power Shovel Co. v. Huntsman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lyle Brown, Justice.
Marion Power Shovel Co. was the plaintiff in the trial court. Harold Huntsman, appellee and cross-appellant, was the defendant and counterclaimant below. Marion sued for parts supplied to Huntsman which were used to repair a power shovel with a dragline attachment. Huntsman countered with a complaint for breach of warranty concerning the original construction equipment, it having been manufactured by Marion. Huntsman obtained judgment (the trial court sitting as a jury) under his counterclaim and Marion appeals. Huntsman cross-appeals, alleging insufficiency of damages.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Dailey v. Holiday Distributing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Hunt v. PERKINS MACHINERY CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Hewitt-Robins, Inc. v. Lea County Sand & Gravel, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Ruberoid Company, Incorporated v. W. P. Briscoe and Gordon L. Briscoe, Doing Business as Briscoe & BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by15 opinions
- Farmer v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Taterka v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Pearson v. Franklin Laboratories, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Whitaker v. Farmhand, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
- Gramling v. BaltzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.