Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Taterka v. Ford Motor Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1978No. 76-230PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

On September 20, 1971, Taterka entered into a contract to purchase a 1972 Ford Mustang from a Milwaukee Ford dealer. Taterka took delivery of the car on January 14, 1972. At that time he was given an owner’s manual and a Warranty Facts booklet. In October, 1974, Taterka discovered that the taillight assembly gaskets had been installed in a way which permitted water to enter causing rust to form. On November 7, 1974, Taterka notified Ford of this rust problem by calling Ford’s Boston district office. Ford did not take any action to correct the problem and Tat-erka commenced this action on July…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wilson Trading Corp. v. David Ferguson, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Carlson v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Maynard v. Port Publications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hahn v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. In Re Gen. Motors Corp. Anti-Lock Brake Products Liability Lit.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API