Legal Opinion
Dailey v. Holiday Distributing Corporation
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided June 6, 1967No. 52534PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRawlings, J.
Action at law by- purchasers of dry cleaning machinery to recover damages for breach of warranties, express and implied, from manufacturer and dealer. From judgment for plaintiffs on trial to the court both defendants appeal. We reverse.
January 15, 1962, plaintiffs Doyle Dailey and Gunvald Sande bought from defendant Holiday Distributing Corporation, for installation in Algona, a twin unit automatic dry cleaner with instruction sign and auxiliary exhaust fan, manufactured by defendant Speed Queen, a Division of McGraw-Edison Company. Total cost was $7506.46.
An unqualified purchase order…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Anderson-Weber, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Webber v. E. K. Larimer Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Thompson v. Burke Engineering Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- MORRIS PLAN LEASING COMPANY v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Garbark v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- C & J Fertilizer, Inc. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SandbulteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- McElroy v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.