Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Franklin Laboratories, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1977No. 11552-11559PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice (on second reassignment).

Defendants appeal from judgments entered in favor of plaintiffs following a consolidated trial to the court of four separate actions for damages resulting from the use of defendants’ cattle vaccine. Plaintiffs have cross appealed on the question of damages. We affirm.

Plaintiffs operate ranches in Perkins and Corson Counties, South Dakota. In the spring of 1971, each bought a supply of a combination infectious bovine rhinotracheit-is vaccine and leptospira pomona bacterin (hereinafter IBR-Lepto) manufactured by Franklin Laboratories, Inc., (Franklin),…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Berry v. G. D. Searle & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Garcia v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Cline v. Prowler Industries of MaryLand, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Hill v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Leslie v. City of BonesteelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API