Legal Opinion

Gramling v. Baltz

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 23, 1972No. 5-5905PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

This is a suit by appellant, a buyer, to recover damages from appellee-Baltz, the seller, and appellee-international Harvester Co., the manufacturer of a truck. The appellant alleged a breach of express warranty and, also, a breach of an implied warranty of merchantability and fitness of the truck for a particular purpose. At the conclusion of appellant’s case, the court found that appellant had failed to proffer substantial evidence to support his allegations and directed a verdict against him. For reversal, appellant first contends that the court erred in directing a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacK Trucks of Arkansas, Inc. v. Jet Asphalt and Rock Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. TrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Ingle v. Marked Tree Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. International Harvester Company v. PikeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Marion Power Shovel Co. v. HuntsmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Alexander v. McEwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Herrick v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Dorman v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API