Gramling v. Baltz
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
This is a suit by appellant, a buyer, to recover damages from appellee-Baltz, the seller, and appellee-international Harvester Co., the manufacturer of a truck. The appellant alleged a breach of express warranty and, also, a breach of an implied warranty of merchantability and fitness of the truck for a particular purpose. At the conclusion of appellant’s case, the court found that appellant had failed to proffer substantial evidence to support his allegations and directed a verdict against him. For reversal, appellant first contends that the court erred in directing a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MacK Trucks of Arkansas, Inc. v. Jet Asphalt and Rock Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Ford Motor Co. v. TrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Ingle v. Marked Tree Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- International Harvester Company v. PikeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Marion Power Shovel Co. v. HuntsmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Alexander v. McEwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Herrick v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Dorman v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.