Legal Opinion
Gioielli v. Mallard Cove Condominium Ass'n
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 16, 1995No. 13719PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendant appeals, after a trial to the court, from a judgment for the plaintiff, grant*823ing him an easement by prescription and enjoining the defendant’s interference with that easement.1
The defendant claims that the plaintiff did not sustain his burden of proof and that the trial court improperly (1) granted a permanent injunction when the plaintiff had no prescriptive easement,2 (2) found that any additional use of the right-of-way at issue after 1986 was not an overuse of any previously acquired right, and (3) excluded from evidence an aerial photograph of the property. We affirm the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. GantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Robert S. Weiss & Co. v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Kuras v. KopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Klar Crest Realty, Inc. v. Rajon Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Lichteig v. ChurinetzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Gallo-Mure v. TomchikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- McManus v. RoggiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Boccanfuso v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Simonds v. ShawConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.