Legal Opinion
Lichteig v. Churinetz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 30, 1986No. 4025PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
This case involves a dispute over a nine foot right of way. The plaintiff, the owner of the servient estate, sought injunctive relief against the defendants William W. Churinetz (hereinafter the defendant), the owner of the dominant estate, and the estate of Joan M. Churinetz, for claimed misuse of the right of way. After a trial to the court, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff.
The court concluded as follows: (1) that the present use of the easement was unreasonable and overburdening; (2) that the defendant should be enjoined from using the easement except as access to and from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Berin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Royce v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Peterson v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Birdsey v. KosienskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Carbone v. VigliottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hart, Nininger & Campbell Associates v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- McCullough v. Waterfront Park Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Hagist v. WashburnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.