Legal Opinion
John E. Mahan v. Thomas F. Doumani and Clarence S. Coe, (Two Cases)
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 25, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7014, 7015PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decisions of the Board of Patent Interferences in two related interferences, Nos. 87,638 and 89,790, consolidated for review by this court as a result of motions by appellant. The same inventors are involved in each interference and the subject matter is closely related. In each case, appellees were awarded priority below on the basis of the disclosure in Patent No. 2,645,079, which issued from application Serial No. 539,030 filed June 6, 1944 (hereinafter the 1944 application). Neither party took testimony.
In No. 7014, appellant relied on the filing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- George E. Hall, Jr. v. Louis B. TaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Farrington v. MikeskaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Marion Den Beste v. Harry MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Carlo v. Bocciarelli v. Charles E. HuffmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weil v. FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Application of Harry Louis Yale, Francis Alexander Sowinski and Jack BernsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Melvin D. Hurwitz v. George Shiu Yim PoonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Harold R. Miller v. Ronald R. House, and Yun JenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Walberg v. ProbstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973