Legal Opinion
Walberg v. Probst
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 8, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8772PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to appel-lee Probst, the junior party. Probst is involved through his application serial No. 272,615, filed April 12, 1963.1 Wal-berg is involved through application serial No. 471,965, filed July 14, 1965,2 which is a division of application serial No. 254,899, filed January 30, 1963.
The Invention
The invention relates to electrostatic-hydrostatic coating apparatus described in appellant’s brief as follows:
The invention involves an electrostatic spray painting device of a type…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vernon C. Applegate and John H. Howell v. Otto Scherer, Heinz Frensch and Gerhard StählerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Nordson CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
- Foster v. AntisdelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899
- Hsing T. Huang v. Lee C. CheneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- John E. Mahan v. Thomas F. Doumani and Clarence S. Coe, (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stamicarbon, N.V. v. Chemical Construction Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975