Legal Opinion

In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Joan K.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2012No. S-13800PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

An adult woman diagnosed with a mental illness appeals her already completed 30-day *595involuntary commitment to Alaska Psychiatric Institute (APT), arguing the evidence did not support the superior court's findings that: (1) she was likely to cause harm to herself or others due to her mental illness; and (2) API was the least restrictive alternative placement for her. Because our existing case law provides that an evidentiary-based "weight of the evidence" challenge to a completed involuntary commitment is moot absent accompanying legal issues appropriate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. Alfred H.H.Illinois Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. LodgeTexas Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In the Matter of B.B., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired, B.B.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Jacob S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. D.L. v. Sheppard Pratt Health Sys.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Gabriel C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API