In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Joan K.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
An adult woman diagnosed with a mental illness appeals her already completed 30-day *595involuntary commitment to Alaska Psychiatric Institute (APT), arguing the evidence did not support the superior court's findings that: (1) she was likely to cause harm to herself or others due to her mental illness; and (2) API was the least restrictive alternative placement for her. Because our existing case law provides that an evidentiary-based "weight of the evidence" challenge to a completed involuntary commitment is moot absent accompanying legal issues appropriate…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. Alfred H.H.Illinois Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LodgeTexas Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In the Matter of B.B., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired, B.B.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
- In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Jacob S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- D.L. v. Sheppard Pratt Health Sys.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Gabriel C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.