Employment Security Commission v. Peace
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCRODDEN, Judge.
Based upon its lone assignment of error, the Commission argues only that the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees because N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-17(bl) (1993) prohibits such an award.
Respondent filed his claim under Article 2 of the Employment Security Law, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 96-8 to -19 (1993). Section 96-17(b1) states, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this Chapter ... in any court proceeding under this Chapter each party shall bear its own costs and legal fees.” This statute “directly addresses the issue of attorneys’ fees . . . [and] is specific to actions under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- In re StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Tay v. FlahertyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Whittington v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- S.E.T.A. UNC-CH, Inc. v. HuffinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walker v. North Carolina Coastal Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Employment Security Commission v. PeaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Walker v. NC COASTAL RESOURCES COM'NCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996