In re State
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.
There is no inherent or inalienable right of appeal from an inferior court to a Superior Court or from a Superior Court to the Supreme Court. Cox v. Kinston, 217 N.C. 391, 8 S.E. 2d 252; S. v. Miller, 225 N.C. 213, 34 S.E. 2d 143; 2 A.J. 847.
A fortiori, no appeal lies from an order or decision of an administrative agency of the State or from the Judgments of special statutory tribunals whose proceedings are not according to the course of the common law, unless the right is granted by statute. 2 A.J. 858, sec. 19. If the right exists, it is brought into being, and is a right granted, by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Vivian v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Utilities Com. v. . Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re the Assessment of Additional Sales & Use Taxes Against Halifax Paper Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Snow v. North Carolina Board of ArchitectureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bio-Medical Applications of North Carolina, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Sinodis v. STATE BD. OF ALCOHOLIC CON., MALT BEV. DIV.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Dare County v. North Carolina Department of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.