Legal Opinion
S.E.T.A. UNC-CH, Inc. v. Huffines
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided September 15, 1992No. 9110SC718PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s determination that petitioner is not entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 6-19.2. Petitioner’s amended motion requests reimbursement under N.C.G.S. § 6-19.2 in the amount of $32,356.53 for litigation expenses incurred in petitioner’s action to compel respondent to disclose certain documents as required by N.C.G.S. §§ 132-1 et seq., the Public Records Act. The four documents at issue describe proposed laboratory research on animal subjects at the Chapel Hill campus of the University of North Carolina.
In petitioner’s prior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening v. Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, and James P. Wachtendonk, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Tay v. FlahertyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crowell Constructors, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. CobeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- North Carolina Department of Correction v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Daily Express, Inc. v. BeattyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Crowell Constructors, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. CobeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Employment Security Commission v. PeaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.