Whittington v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
We begin by noting that although this case arises in the context of controversial regulations pertaining to state funded abortions, this case is not about abortions. Rather, it is a case solely about administrative rule-making authority and whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs in regard to that question. For the reasons below, we find that the trial court did not err.
Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c) (1983), summary judgment is appropriate only when the “pleadings, depositions', answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- National Food Stores v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Hagler v. HaglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Abernethy v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Francine Delany New School for Children, Inc. v. Asheville City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Taylor v. City of LenoirCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Carter-Hubbard Publishing Co. v. WRMC Hospital Operating Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Andersen v. BaccusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Carolina Truck & Body Co., Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.