Town of Checotah v. Town of Eufaula
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Original.action by the Town of Checotah and others against the Town of Eufaula and others for writ of injunction. To the report of a referee appointed to take evidence, with his findings of fact and conclusions of law, the plaintiffs except.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
November 13, 1908, there was delivered by this court an opinion, entitled Town of Eufaula v. Gibson et al., 22 Okla. 507, 98 Pac. 565, under which a second election was called in McIntosh county for the purpose of permanently locating the county seat in said county, in which Eufaula and Checotah alone would be the participants. In accordance therewith, notices were issued, and the same was duly held February 10, 1910. Thereafter the town of Checotah filed in this court an original action contesting the result of the election, and on August 9, 1910, Hon. Robert J. Ray was appointed to take the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- O'Reiley v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Case v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Western Assurance Co. v. AltheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Blackwell v. City of NewkirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Sutto v. Board of Medical Registration & ExaminationIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Spruce Co. v. MaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Town of Grove v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Farrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.