Legal Opinion

Farrow v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1941No. A-9761PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ Ones, J.

The defendant, W. S. Farrow, was charged 'by information in the county court of Pottawatomie county, on June 5, 1939, with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, was tried, convicted, and sentenced to serve 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $100, from which judgment and sentence he appeals to this court.

Defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to sustain the motion to suppress the evidence. The contentions are:(1) That the affidavit for search warrant does not show probable cause.(2) That the affidavit for search warrant and search warrant are insufficient in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Atwood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Markey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  3. State v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. McCain v. BonnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Pitzer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. United States v. Gerardo Bueno-VargasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Harlin R. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Willhite v. WillhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Lindley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API