Legal Opinion

Dunn v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1993No. C0-92-1669PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Appellant Lillian Dunn is before this court for the second time appealing the denial of a petition for postconviction relief. In Dunn v. State, 486 N.W.2d 428, 433 (Minn.1992), we affirmed the postconviction court as to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting Dunn’s conviction of first degree felony murder and as to the admissibility of certain videotaped and photographic evidence, but remanded for consideration of defendant’s pro se allegation that she was denied a fair trial because one of the jurors was a relative of the officer who arrested her. On the record before us,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. ElingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. BlissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Simmons v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Jama v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API