Dunn v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
In her third petition for posteonviction relief, appellant Lillian Virginia Dunn has asserted claims of prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of trial counsel, stemming from her convictions for first-degree felony murder and kidnapping. 1 The postconviction court summarily denied her petition, and we affirm.
We have recounted the facts of this case on prior occasions. See Dunn v. State, 486 N.W.2d 428, 430-31 (Minn.1992); see also Dunn v. State, 499 N.W.2d 37 (Minn.1993). For purposes of our decision today, it is sufficient to note that Dunn was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simmons v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007