Legal Opinion

Jama v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 2008No. A07-1864PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant argues in a postconviction petition that he was deprived of a fair trial as a result of his attorney’s ineffective assistance. The state opposes relief, in part, on the ground that the issue could have been raised in appellant’s direct appeal. Because fairness requires review and because appellant did not deliberately and inexcusably fail to raise the issue on direct appeal, he may raise the ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel issue in this postconviction proceeding. But because appellant has failed to show that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  2. State of Minnesota v. Larry Leo Geleneau, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API