Legal Opinion
Standal v. Armstrong Cork Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 16, 1984No. C1-84-615PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Odber Standal, Sr. brought a product liability action for injuries suffered as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers contained in products sold by several manufacturers, including Keasbey & Mattison Co. Standal sought to hold Nicolet, Inc. liable as a successor to Keasbey. The trial court granted summary judgment finding Nicolet had no liability as a successor to Keasbey. Standal appeals. We reverse.
FACTS
Standal is a Minnesota construction worker who suffers from asbestosis. In 1942-1943 he was exposed to asbestos-containing insulation manufactured by Keas-bey’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Pako Corp. v. CitytrustDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Hagstrom v. American Circuit Breaker Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Young v. Fulton Iron Works Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- SCM Corp. v. Deltak Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.