Legal Opinion
Hagstrom v. American Circuit Breaker Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 14, 1994No. C5-93-2424PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
A manufacturer and an independent sales representative dispute whether their sales agreement has been effectively terminated. The district court granted summary judgment for the manufacturer, holding that the parties’ contractual choice of law provision applied and that the sales agreement had been effectively terminated. We agree that the contractual choice of law is enforceable, and we affirm.
FACTS
American Circuit Breaker Corporation manufactures and sells electrical circuit breakers and related items. American Circuit’s principal place of business is in North…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Modern Computer Systems, Inc. v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc. Modern Banking Systems of Southern WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Milliken and Co. v. Eagle Packaging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Combined Insurance Co. of America v. BodeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Northwest Airlines, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Astraea Aviation Services, Inc., Doing Business as Dalfort Aviation, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Rapp v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Airtel Wireless, LLC v. Montana Electronics Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Menzies Aviation, Inc. v. WilcoxDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.