Legal Opinion

Hollerich v. City of Good Thunder

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1983No. CX-82-1483PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

We hold that a liquor vendor who sells intoxicating liquor after hours is, for purposes of the Civil Damages Act, “illegally selling” intoxicating liquor. We reverse the trial court’s contrary ruling.

The facts as stipulated by the parties are as follows. Andrew Hollerich, age 23, at tended the Blue Earth County Fair the evening of August 15, 1979. He arrived at the municipal liquor store of the defendant-respondent City of Good Thunder about 11 p.m., had one mixed drink, and left after a half hour. Andrew gave his brother a ride home and then returned, about midnight, to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Kvanli v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Strand v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Skaja v. Andrews Hotel CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rambaum v. SwisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. K.R. v. SanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Holmquist v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint VenturesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API