Legal Opinion

Rambaum v. Swisher

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1989No. CO-87-2192PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

This case raises two issues: (1) Whether a fraternal club’s sale of liquor to a person not a member or a guest is an illegal sale under the Civil Damages Act; and (2) whether the sum paid by a settling Pier-ringer defendant applies pro tanto to reduce all of plaintiff’s award, not just the share attributable to the settling defendant’s fault. The court of appeals ruled there was an “illegal sale” and the settlement payment did not apply “pro tanto.” We affirm. We decline to reach a third issue not preserved for review.

Early in the evening of September 14, 1985, Susan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Ruth Johnson v. John Rogers, County of Meeker of the State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Kvanli v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Anunti v. PayetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Shantz v. Richview, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Haderlie v. SondgerothWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Thomas v. SolbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. Koehnen v. DufuorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API