Legal Opinion
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 1997No. C7-96-852PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
On appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the liquor licensee in a dram shop action, Scott Englund argues the trial court erred by concluding the licensee’s sale of alcohol, which alcohol the patron consumed off the licensed premises, did not violate chapter 340A.
FACTS
On a summer morning, Donna Mae Jones stopped at the Radisson Hotel South (licensee) on her way to a Lake Harriet beach. As she had done on numerous occasions before, Jones parked near the south entrance, entered the hotel through a back door by the pool, proceeded directly to the bar, and ordered…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State v. OrselloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Clark v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998