People v. Noland
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of violating section 476 of the Vehicle Code. The part of that section here involved reads: “Whenever traffic is controlled by official traffic control signals exhibiting the words ‘Go/ ‘Caution/ or ‘Stop/ or exhibiting different colored lights successively, one at a time, or with arrows, the following colors only shall be used, and said terms and lights shall indicate and apply to drivers of vehicles and pedestrians as follows:
“ (a) Green alone or ‘Go.’
“1. Vehicular traffic facing the signal shall proceed straight through or may turn right…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. McLachlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Cope v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holman v. VikoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hopkins v. TyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. HahnAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1950
- People v. HahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Holman v. VikoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958