Legal Opinion

People v. Noland

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1948No. Crim. A. 2325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of violating section 476 of the Vehicle Code. The part of that section here involved reads: “Whenever traffic is controlled by official traffic control signals exhibiting the words ‘Go/ ‘Caution/ or ‘Stop/ or exhibiting different colored lights successively, one at a time, or with arrows, the following colors only shall be used, and said terms and lights shall indicate and apply to drivers of vehicles and pedestrians as follows:

“ (a) Green alone or ‘Go.’

“1. Vehicular traffic facing the signal shall proceed straight through or may turn right…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. McLachlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Cope v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holman v. VikoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Hopkins v. TyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. HahnAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1950
  4. People v. HahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Holman v. VikoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API