Legal Opinion

Cope v. Flannery

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1925No. Docket No. 2835PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

By this action the petitioner sought a writ of mandate against the defendant, as auditor of the county of Sutter, commanding and directing the defendant to issue a warrant upon the treasurer of said county in favor of the petitioner, based upon a claim previously allowed by the board of supervisors of said county.

It appears from the transcript that the petitioner, a construction engineer, and the board of supervisors of the county of Sutter, on or about the fifth day of December, 1922, entered into a certain written contract for the preparation and submission by the petitioner to said board…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Nickerson v. San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Mcconoughey v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. McFarland v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cope v. County of SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Carbon County v. DraperMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Butler v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. People v. NolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API