Cope v. Flannery
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
By this action the petitioner sought a writ of mandate against the defendant, as auditor of the county of Sutter, commanding and directing the defendant to issue a warrant upon the treasurer of said county in favor of the petitioner, based upon a claim previously allowed by the board of supervisors of said county.
It appears from the transcript that the petitioner, a construction engineer, and the board of supervisors of the county of Sutter, on or about the fifth day of December, 1922, entered into a certain written contract for the preparation and submission by the petitioner to said board…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Nickerson v. San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Mcconoughey v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- McFarland v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cope v. County of SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Carbon County v. DraperMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Butler v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. NolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948