Legal Opinion

People v. Hahn

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided July 3, 1950No. Crim. A. No. 2609PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant appeals from the judgment that followed his conviction on a charge of having failed to yield the right of way to a pedestrian who was lawfully in the crosswalk at which the defendant had been halted by a traffic signal saying “Stop.” As debated by the parties to this action, the important question before us, and to which they desire us to give an explicit answer, is this: Must a driver of a motor vehicle, who is waiting at an intersection’s crosswalk because the traffic signal is against him, continue to wait, after the “Go” signal appears, until all the pedestrians in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. McLachlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. People v. NolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. HawkinsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gelini v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. People v. HahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API