Legal Opinion

Norman v. Levenhagen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1927No. 19853. En BancPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in a garnishment proceeding. The appeal is before us upon the findings of fact made by the trial court; the contention being that the findings require a judgment contrary to that entered by the trial court.

The facts as found by the trial court are, in substance these: On May 10, 1924, and for some time both prior and subsequent thereto, the respondents, Walter J. Levenhagen and Augusta Levenhagen, were husband and wife, living together as such. On the date given, Walter J. Levenhagen contracted to purchase certain real property situated in the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Heintz v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Schaefer v. E. F. Gregory Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In Re Kuhn's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Burch v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. McLeodWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Meltzer v. Wendell-WestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Seaton v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API