Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. McLeod

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1929No. 21390. En BancPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tolman, J.:On January 7, 1928, there was entered in this cause a judgment against O. I. Olson and another for upwards of two thousand dollars, which expressly provides that it is a separate obligation and may not be enforced against the community property of Olson and wife.

The judgment creditor caused execution to be issued, which was returned in due time nulla bona. Thereupon supplemental proceedings were instituted on the judgment, and respondent Olson and Ms wife were cited to appear before the court and submit to examination under oath touching property which might be subject to execution…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In Re Carmack's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Norman v. LevenhagenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Riverside Finance Co. v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In Re Williams' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Pollock v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Van Moss v. SailorsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Conley v. MoeWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re the Estate of GulstineWashington Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API