Burch v. Rice
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, C. J.
Plaintiff instituted this action against defendants for the purpose of securing a decree decláring him the owner of a one-half interest in a restaurant and for an accounting. At the conclusion of the trial, the court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. Thereafter, a decree was entered dismissing plaintiff’s action and confirming title to the property and business in defendants. Plaintiff then appealed to this court. His assignments of error, seventeen in number, call in question the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and challenge the correctness of the decree.
We shall…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jacobs v. HoittWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re Garrity's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Salisbury v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re Dewey's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Gapsch v. GapschIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Hamlin v. MerlinoWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Eagle Insurance v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- In re the Marriage of ChumbleyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.