Legal Opinion

Heintz v. Brown

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1907No. 6222PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Adams county, Warren, J., entered October 19, 1905, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, enjoining an execution sale of real property.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

In the month of December, 1900, the plaintiff, Alice Heintz, entered into a contract with the Northern Pacific Railway Company for the purchase of fractional section 5, Tp. 20, N., R. 38 E., W. M., containing 208 and a fraction acres. Under the terms of this contract, the purchase price was to be paid in five annual installments of about $62 each. Three of these installments were paid by the plaintiff out of her separate funds, acquired by bequest from tier deceased father. On the 25th day of January, 1904;, she borrowed money on this land from the Holland Bank to pay the deferred payments,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parker v. G. Y. Coop.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Yesler v. HochstettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Love v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Schuyler v. BroughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Guye v. GuyeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Katterhagen v. MeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Vieux v. VieuxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API