Legal Opinion

Seaton v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1936No. 25987. En BancPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

The plaintiff in this action, Bell Seaton, and one George Seaton were, for some time prior to 1928, husband and wife. It being contemplated that the parties would shortly be divorced, they, under date December 13,1928, entered into an agreement to divide their real estate, pursuant to which they deeded one to the other the different parcels of real estate which they owned, each deed providing that the property so conveyed should he the separate property of the grantee.

In an action instituted by Bell Seaton against her husband for the purpose of procuring a decree of divorce, an interlocutory…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guye v. GuyeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Yesler v. HochstettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Knowles v. SlocumWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Dobbins v. Dexter Horton & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of WitteWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re Estate of VerbeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Scott v. CurrieWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. In Re Dewey's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API