Legal Opinion

Steinhouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.

Natawadee Steinhouse, M.D. (Provider) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a *354workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) denying Provider’s Petition for Review of Utilization Review Determination (Utilization Review Petition). We vacate and remand for the reasons set forth below.

Pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable, Jesse Stripling (Claimant) began receiving compensation benefits for an injury described as “head concussion, neck, back, right knee and mouth” that occurred while he was working for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. KatchmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CastroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. CastroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Tindal v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. C. Mecca v. WCAB (Procura Mgmt., Inc. and Zenith Ins.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Diamond Manufacturing Company v. WCAB (Archavage)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API