Commonwealth v. Castro
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
LAZARUS, J.:
Jose Castro appeals from his judgment of sentence imposed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on June 22, 2009. Because Castro has satisfied each element of the four-part after-discovered evidence test based on alleged police corruption, we vacate and remand for an evidentiary hearing.
The relevant factual history is as follows. On March 11, 2008, Philadelphia Narcotics Officer Richard Cujdik1 met with a Confidential Informant, identified only as CI-142, to investigate a home in the Kensington section of Philadelphia for suspected drug activity. Officer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. PaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. PadillasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. EsteppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MedinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. CastroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. PerrinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. PerrinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Com. v. Flick, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.