Legal Opinion

Tindal v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FLAHERTY.

Paula Tindal (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Claimant’s Claim Petition. We affirm.

On April 22, 1988, Claimant filed a Claim Petition alleging that, on January 15, 1988, she developed carpal tunnel syndrome while working as a laborer for the City of Philadelphia, Department of Licenses and Inspection (Employer). This *221ease was originally assigned to Referee1 Inez Lundy, who heard the testimony and accepted the evidence submitted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Dow v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. M & D Auto Body v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. A. Jacob v. WCAB (Cardone Industries, Inc. and Phoenix/Travelers Ins. Cos.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. N. Brinkley v. WCAB (US Airways, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. R.J. Coppola, Jr. v. Bureau of Motor VehiclesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API