Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Castro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 2014PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a newspaper article submitted as the sole support for a motion for new trial on the basis of after-discovered evidence warrants the grant of a hearing. Finding allegations in an article do not constitute evidence, we reverse the Superi- or Court’s order remanding for a hearing on appellee’s after-discovered evidence claim.

Trial testimony established that on March 11, 2008, Officer Richard Cujdik of the Philadelphia Narcotics Field Unit gave pre-recorded money to a confidential informant (CI-142), who entered appellee’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. PaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. EsteppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. MontalvoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. Hannibal, S., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. HeasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API