Commonwealth v. Castro
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a newspaper article submitted as the sole support for a motion for new trial on the basis of after-discovered evidence warrants the grant of a hearing. Finding allegations in an article do not constitute evidence, we reverse the Superi- or Court’s order remanding for a hearing on appellee’s after-discovered evidence claim.
Trial testimony established that on March 11, 2008, Officer Richard Cujdik of the Philadelphia Narcotics Field Unit gave pre-recorded money to a confidential informant (CI-142), who entered appellee’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. PaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. EsteppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. MontalvoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. Hannibal, S., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. HeasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.