Kidwell v. Brummagim
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.:
Jacob C. Beideman, a resident of San Francisco, died on the 8th of July, 1865, seized of a large amount of real estate in the City and County of San Francisco. He left a will bearing date the 26th day of January, 1863, in which it is provided as follows : “First—The executor of this my last will and testament will, within one year after my decease, sell at public auction, in proper subdivisions, at said city and county, after giving two months notice of such sale, a.11 the real estate I shall own, be seized, possessed of or interested in at the time of my decease,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daly's Lessee v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Sheldon v. Hudson River Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- Lessee of Zebach v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1810
- Smith ex dem. Roosevelt v. Van DursenNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Peebles v. Watts' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morffew v. S.F. & San Rafael R.R.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Huntoon v. Southern Trust & Commerce BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Crouse v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- McClure v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.