Legal Opinion

Peebles v. Watts' Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 16, 1839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Chancery. From the Circuit Court for Clark County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The order of the county court, appointing J. Woods, administrator, with the will annexed, though defective and erroneous, in not stating that the executors named in the will had refused to qualify, is not, therefore, necessarily void, but is valid, if the fact be that the executors refused to qualify. Whether this fact, though not stated in the order, should, or should not, be presumed in favor of the jurisdiction of the county court, in such cases, it may be proved where the validity of the order comes collaterally in question, as was decided…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kidwell v. BrummagimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Probate Court of Newport v. HazardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API